Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 761/2024 — Case between Kamala M.Kumar vs Rekha Sugathan regarding Realisation of Money
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
RP.No.274/2024
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Balaganapathy Temple et al regarding application to restore suit
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner/plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed. The respondents remained absent despite notice.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP. No. 287/2024
Case between Sudharsanan Pillai vs Lalithakumari Amma et al regarding restoration of petitions.
Sudharsanan Pillai filed a petition to restore a previous case. The respondents remained exparte during the hearing.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 24/2025
Case between Vishnu K.Vinod vs Fathima et al regarding lifting of attachment over property
Vishnu K.Vinod filed a petition to lift the attachment on his property claimed by Fathima. The case revolves around the validity of the attachment based on a demand promissory note disputed by the petitioner.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 232/2017
Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
The case involves Sumathi.N, who is seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property that she claims was improperly sold by her relatives, Sreelatha and Suresh. The defendants allegedly misled her into selling her property and have evicted her without fulfilling promises made to repurchase it for her.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
RP 83/2024 in RP 37/2022 OS 840/2018
Case between Sylesh vs Prasannakumari regarding petition dismissal for default.
The petitioner is Sylesh, who filed the RP against respondent Prasannakumari. The petition was dismissed for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 689/2023
Case between Rajesh Mohan vs Jyothikumar regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Rajesh Mohan, has filed a suit against the defendant, Jyothikumar, to recover Rs. 5,00,000/- which was borrowed on 19/04/2023 and secured by a cheque that was dishonoured. The defendant did not repay the amount despite receiving a legal notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 977/2023
Case between Joseph Nocholas vs Jayan et al regarding Realisation of Money
Joseph Nocholas filed a suit against Jayan and his wife Vishnu Priya for the recovery of Rs. 2,75,000 that was borrowed but not repaid. The defendants issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to a closed account.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 220/2020
Case between K.N. Mohanan vs M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, K.N. Mohanan, a licensed contractor, is seeking to recover an amount of ₹10,00,000 from the defendants. The claim arises from a borrowed sum that was supposed to be repaid but remained outstanding after the cheque was dishonoured.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1007/2023
Case between Arun Raj.N. vs Murukeshan regarding Realisation of Money
Arun Raj.N. filed a suit against Murukeshan for the realization of money owed. The defendant borrowed Rs. 3,50,000/- and issued a cheque which was later dishonoured.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.629/2024
Case between G. Gopakumar vs Nijad Nissam regarding Realisation of Money
G. Gopakumar is the plaintiff who has filed a suit against Nijad Nissam for the recovery of a loan. The defendant borrowed Rs. 60,000 from the plaintiff and failed to repay the amount despite receiving legal notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 613/2024
Case between Sidhiq. A. vs Navas.A. regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff Sidhiq. A. claims that the defendant Navas.A. borrowed an amount of Rs. 5,95,000/- and issued cheques that were subsequently dishonoured. The plaintiff is seeking to recover Rs. 2,02,033/- along with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 733/2024
Case between Shylaja vs Suresh.D. regarding Realisation of Money
Shylaja is the plaintiff who has filed a suit against Suresh.D. for the recovery of a borrowed amount. The defendant borrowed money from the plaintiff for his house construction and failed to repay as promised.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.465/2021
Case between Baby Xavier vs Jose Mon regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Baby Xavier, is seeking to recover a loan of ₹2,50,000 from the defendant, Jose Mon, who has allegedly failed to repay it. The plaintiff claims the loan was issued on 15.01.2021 and was backed by a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 739/2023
Case between Sheela Shaji vs Biju. G.R regarding realisation of money.
Sheela Shaji, the plaintiff, lent Biju. G.R an amount of Rs. 2,50,000 and was issued a cheque that was dishonoured. Sheela Shaji filed the suit seeking to recover Rs. 2,69,250 along with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 151 OF 2017
Case between Bhaskaran.P.P. vs Saju George Thomas regarding relisation of money
Bhaskaran.P.P. is the plaintiff who seeks to recover Rs.3,00,000/- from Saju George Thomas, the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant promised his daughter-in-law a job abroad in exchange for the money but failed to fulfill the promise.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ST-113/2017
Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co (P) Ltd. vs Gandhivel.M regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
M/s. Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co (P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Gandhivel.M for dishonor of a cheque issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt. The court found the accused guilty.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 171/2024
Case between R.Ashtaman vs Nidhin Kumar @ Kallada Nidhin Kumar regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, R.Ashtaman, claims that the defendant, Nidhin Kumar, borrowed money for a job assurance and failed to repay it. The defendant provided a dishonored cheque as repayment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ST - 04/2019
Case between Najumul Huda vs Appukuttan regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Najumul Huda is the complainant filing against Appukuttan for the offence of dishonor of a cheque under Section 138. The accused borrowed money from the complainant and issued a cheque that was dishonored.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No65/2020
Case between Raju Lawrance vs Mrs. Saphy V.R. regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Raju Lawrance is the complainant and Mrs. Saphy V.R. is the accused in this case under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant sought a remedy for a cheque bounce issue.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 142/2023
Case between Navas vs Hashim regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Navas filed a complaint against Hashim for not honoring a cheque issued for repayment of a loan. The court found the accused not guilty due to the complainant's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 354/2019
Case between Kishore vs Lathika Kumari regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Kishore filed a complaint against Lathika Kumari alleging that she borrowed money and issued a cheque that was dishonoured. The case revolves around the violation of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No.10/2021
Case between Subair.M vs S. Sajeevan regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act
The complainant Subair.M, aged 64, accused S. Sajeevan of an offence under U/s. 138 N.I. Act. The matter was settled between the parties leading to the withdrawal of the complaint.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 59/2020
Case between T.S. Pradeep vs Suni Lal regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
T.S. Pradeep filed a complaint against Suni Lal for dishonoring a cheque. The court found the accused not guilty and dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's absence.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 60/2020
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
R. Sreekumar, the complainant, alleged that Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran, the accused, failed to repay a cheque amounting to Rupees Eight lakhs. The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 106/2019
Case between S.Supriyakumar vs B.Shinu @ Shinu.B.Krishnan regarding dishonor of cheques under Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant S.Supriyakumar filed a complaint against B.Shinu @ Shinu.B.Krishnan alleging that the accused defaulted on repayment for cheques issued against a borrowed loan. The court found the accused guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 107/2019
Case between S.Supriyakumar vs B.Shinu @ Shinu.B.Krishnan regarding offence under Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant, S.Supriyakumar, accused B.Shinu of failing to repay a loan. The case involves the dishonor of cheques issued by the accused as repayment for the loan.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST 171/2019
Case between Legendary Distributers vs Asfal regarding cheque dishonor.
The complainant, Legendary Distributers, alleged that the accused, Asfal, failed to pay for goods purchased and issued cheques that were dishonored. The court found the accused not guilty of the offence.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No.439/2019
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Shanavas filed a complaint against Sunil Lal for issuing a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court ultimately dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
OS. No. 174/2018
Case between Chandrababu.S vs Shobha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff Chandrababu.S filed a suit against the defendants Shobha.S and Sajeev.N for the realization of money. The defendants allegedly issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No.15/2020
Case between Beena S.H. vs Sree Lekshmi regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Beena S.H. is the complainant, and Sree Lekshmi is the accused. The case involves an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
OS. No.698/2018
Case between Suja.T.S. vs Babudas regarding Realisation of Money.
The plaintiff, Suja.T.S., has filed a suit against the defendant, Babudas, for the recovery of Rs. 7,60,000/- which includes the amount borrowed and interest due to a dishonoured cheque. The case revolves around the loan amount and the circumstances of the cheque's issuance.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No.140/2023
Case between Sindhu vs Vimala regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Sindhu is the complainant who filed a complaint against Vimala under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the complainant was absent, and a death certificate was produced, leading to the case against the accused being abated.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
OS. 217/2025
Case between Anil.B vs Prathap.R.S regarding conditional attachment before judgment
Anil.B filed a petition for conditional attachment against Prathap.R.S due to non-payment of a cheque amounting to Rs.7 lakhs. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay despite multiple agreements and promises.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ST.No. 48/2020
Case between Jamaludeen K.P. vs A. Mani regarding dishonour of cheque
Jamaludeen K.P. filed a complaint against A. Mani for dishonour of a cheque issued in discharge of a debt. The court found A. Mani guilty under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST.No. 421/2019
Case between A. Kabeer vs Sam Jolly regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
A. Kabeer filed a complaint against Sam Jolly alleging the dishonor of a cheque for Rs. 14,00,000 issued by the accused in repayment of borrowed money. The court found the accused guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST.No. 20/2020
Case between Sreekanth vs R. Ajithkumar regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Sreekanth, the complainant, alleges that R. Ajithkumar borrowed money and issued a cheque that was dishonoured. The complainant sought legal redress for this alleged offense under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No.34/2020
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant Shanavas alleged that the accused Sunil Lal issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court dismissed the complaint as the complainant did not appear to prosecute the case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 87/2020
Case between A.K. Gopalakrishna Pillai vs Rathi regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, A.K. Gopalakrishna Pillai, alleged that the accused, Rathi, borrowed Rs. 3,00,000 and issued a cheque that was later dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The case revolves around proving the debt and the subsequent dishonour of the cheque.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST.No. 21/2020
Case between Vargheese vs R. Sasidharan Pillai regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant, Vargheese, alleges that the accused, R. Sasidharan Pillai, borrowed Rs.5,00,000 and issued a cheque that was dishonoured. The case concerns the failure to fulfil this financial obligation.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No.126/2023
Case between Joseph P. Thomas vs Fabian Prince regarding Offence U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Joseph P. Thomas filed a complaint against Fabian Prince under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was represented in court during the proceedings.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST 185/2019
Case between K.R.Vasudevan vs Anandan.P regarding offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
K.R.Vasudevan, the complainant, alleged that Anandan.P issued a cheque which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The case revolves around the non-repayment of a loan amounting to Rs.3,00,000/-.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No.249/2019
Case between Sheeba George vs Darvin Augustine regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Sheeba George filed a complaint against Darvin Augustine under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court heard the case and the complainant presented a withdrawal petition.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST.No. 85/2023
Case between Shine vs Najmi regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The complainant, Shine, alleged that the accused, Najmi, borrowed Rs. 4,00,000 and issued a cheque which was dishonored. The case was dismissed due to the complainant's absence.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
S.T. No. 152/2019
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Ltd. vs Syam Prasanth.S regarding U/s. 138 of N.I Act.
The complainant, Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Ltd., represented by M.G.Sunil Kumar, filed a case against the accused Syam Prasanth.S under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was settled, leading to the withdrawal of the complaint and acquittal of the accused.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
ST.No. 158/2023
Case between Sreekala.S vs S.Saji regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Sreekala.S filed a complaint against S.Saji for an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to the dishonor of a cheque. The court found the accused not guilty as the complainant failed to appear for the evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 103/2023
Case between Sunitha vs Niyas Aliyarukunju regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
The complainant, Sunitha, filed a complaint against the accused, Niyas Aliyarukunju, alleging that he issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The case was dismissed as the complainant failed to appear to prosecute the case.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
ST.No. 284/2019
Case between M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. vs Smt. Amina Beevi regarding offence U/S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Smt. Amina Beevi alleging an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case involves a cheque issued by the accused which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Criminal Case
Plaintiff Won
S.T. No. 152/2023
Case between Prabhakumari vs Smt. Minikumari regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Prabhakumari filed a complaint against Smt. Minikumari under the N.I. Act. The court has granted the withdrawal of the complaint and acquitted the accused.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won