Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.No. 284/2019

Case between M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. vs Smt. Amina Beevi regarding offence U/S. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Sofia. T.A
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
approximately-6 years 3 months
Case Code No.
284
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd. filed a complaint against Smt. Amina Beevi alleging an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case involves a cheque issued by the accused which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused, Smt. Amina Beevi, was found guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. She was sentenced to imprisonment for two months and ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/-.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Smt. Amina Beevi, was found guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. She was sentenced to imprisonment for two months and ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/-.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant proved beyond reasonable doubt that the cheque was executed and dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant proved beyond reasonable doubt that the cheque was executed and dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant would prove beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt that Ext.P4 cheque was executed and issued by the accused in favour of the complainant in the discharge of a legally enforceable debt...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Thousand only) to the complainant U/S. 357 (3) Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Co.(P) Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Amina Beevi
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Resolution dated 07/02/2015, Promissory note for Rs.2,40,000/- dated 11/06/2013, Ledger Extract dated 04/04/2020, Cheque bearing No.873052 dated 11/02/2015, Memorandum of cheque unpaid dated 26/03/2015, Advocate Notice dated 30/03/2015, Postal receipt dated 30/03/2015, Acknowledgment card dated 31/03/2015, Statement of account dated 27/06/2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.R. Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.R. Rameshkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/- to the complainant.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,40,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Forty Thousand only) to the complainant U/S. 357 (3) Cr.P.C.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Imprisonment for two months.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two months.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Further simple imprisonment if compensation not paid.
Evidence:
In default of payment of compensation, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one month.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was issued by the accused in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Memorandum of Cheque unpaid
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It demonstrates the reason for the dishonour of the cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the cheque returned was for insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P5(a)
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is the legal demand made to the accused to pay the amount covered under the cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the dispatch of the legal notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the legal notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides financial details relevant to the matter.
Reference:
Ext.P9

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
2 months

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 05/05/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jamaludeen K.P. vs A. Mani regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-V, Kollam
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kishore vs Lathika Kumari regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between T.S. Pradeep vs Suni Lal regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class – V, Kollam
Criminal Case Defendant Won