Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST.No. 48/2020

Case between Jamaludeen K.P. vs A. Mani regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-V, Kollam
Judge
Smt.Sofia. T.A
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Code No.
48
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jamaludeen K.P. filed a complaint against A. Mani for dishonour of a cheque issued in discharge of a debt. The court found A. Mani guilty under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was found guilty and sentenced to two months of imprisonment along with a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- to the complainant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs.3,00,000/-
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found guilty and sentenced to two months of imprisonment along with a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- to the complainant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found ample evidence that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On the basis of the oral and documentary evidence, the complainant would prove beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt that Ext.P1 cheque was executed and issued by the accused in favour of the complainant in the discharge of a legally enforceable debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two months and to pay a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Only) to the complainant U/S. 357 (3) Cr.P.C.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jamaludeen K.P.
Party Age
69
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. Mani
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No. 415351 dated 20/08/2017, Cheque Dishonour memo dated 27/08/2017, Office Copy of Advocate Notice dated 13/09/2017, Postal receipt, Postal acknowledgment card dated 16/09/2017, Bank Statement for the period from 01/06/2017 to 28/08/2017.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of chief affidavit of accused in CC No.7/2019, Certified Copy of legal notice dated 06/08/2015 in connection with CC No.7/2019.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Syam Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Abdul Shahan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The complainant sought compensation for the dishonoured cheque.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to pay a compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Only) to the complainant U/S. 357 (3) Cr.P.C.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused was sentenced to undergo imprisonment.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque was executed and issued by the accused in favour of the complainant in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque Dishonour Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo indicates that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice was issued to demand payment of the cheque amount.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipt evidences the dispatch of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The card evidences the receipt of the legal notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement shows the financial transaction relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Chief Affidavit
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The affidavit was submitted in relation to a separate case to support the defendant's claims.
Reference:
Ext.D1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The notice relates to a previous case involving the accused.
Reference:
Ext.D2
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The complaint was submitted relating to a transaction with the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.D3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The notice relates to another legal matter concerning the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.D4
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The judgment is related to a case that impacts the defendant's claims.
Reference:
Ext.D5
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The cheque is related to another case involving the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.D6
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The notice relates to a different transaction involving the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.D7
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The cheque is associated with another legal matter involving the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.D8

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
2 months

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/17/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A. Kabeer vs Sam Jolly regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanavas vs Sunil Lal regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kishore vs Lathika Kumari regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-V
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between T.S. Pradeep vs Suni Lal regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between R. Sreekumar vs Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class – V, Kollam
Criminal Case Defendant Won