Case Summary
R. Sreekumar, the complainant, alleged that Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran, the accused, failed to repay a cheque amounting to Rupees Eight lakhs. The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed and the accused was acquitted due to the absence of the complainant, who failed to appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
The complainant showed no interest in prosecuting the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is presumed that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted. The accused is set at liberty and the bail bond executed by her shall stand cancelled.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R. Sreekumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Smt. Kavitha Venkideswaran
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. L. Linton
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.G. Baiju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The complaint is dismissed and the accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2020
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour