Case Summary
Shanavas filed a complaint against Sunil Lal for issuing a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court ultimately dismissed the complaint and acquitted the accused.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed and the accused was acquitted due to the complainant's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted. The accused is set at liberty and the bail bond executed by him shall stand cancelled.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanavas
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil Lal
- Relation
- Prop. Smart Four Rice Agencies
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.Abdul Khalam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Francis Jude Netto
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2019
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act