Case Summary
The complainant, Vargheese, alleges that the accused, R. Sasidharan Pillai, borrowed Rs.5,00,000 and issued a cheque that was dishonoured. The case concerns the failure to fulfil this financial obligation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absence and failure to present evidence, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the complainant was not interested in prosecuting the case due to his absence.
The court found that the complainant was not interested in prosecuting the case due to his absence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is presumed that complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vargheese
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R. Sasidharan Pillai
- Party Age
- 58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Paul Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.Subrahmanian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2020
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act