Case Summary
Bhaskaran.P.P. is the plaintiff who seeks to recover Rs.3,00,000/- from Saju George Thomas, the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant promised his daughter-in-law a job abroad in exchange for the money but failed to fulfill the promise.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation from the defendant and from his assets.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff proved his case against the defendant. The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the amount sought.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidences adduced by the plaintiff remain unchallenged and proved the case.
The evidences adduced by the plaintiff remain unchallenged and proved the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidences adduced by the plaintiff remain unchallenged and proved the case.
The evidences adduced by the plaintiff remain unchallenged and proved the case.
Supporting Evidence
The evidences adduced by the plaintiff remain unchallenged and from the available evidences and from the chief affidavit, this court found that the plaintiff's case is proved.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit decreed as follows: 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation from the defendant and from his assets.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bhaskaran.P.P.
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saju George Thomas
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Cheque, Certified copy of cheque returned memo
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Najmudheen.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The court found that the plaintiff's case is proved.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the cost of the proceedings from the defendant.
Evidence:
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to realize the cost of the proceedings.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the defendant for the repayment of the amount claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo indicating the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Bhaskaran.P.P. vs Saju George Thomas regarding relisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bhaskaran.P.P. vs Saju George Thomas regarding relisation of money
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act