Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 151 OF 2017

Case between Bhaskaran.P.P. vs Saju George Thomas regarding relisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-04-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bhaskaran.P.P. is the plaintiff who seeks to recover Rs.3,00,000/- from Saju George Thomas, the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant promised his daughter-in-law a job abroad in exchange for the money but failed to fulfill the promise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff proved his case against the defendant. The suit has been decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the amount sought.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation from the defendant and from his assets.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidences adduced by the plaintiff remain unchallenged and proved the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed as follows: 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bhaskaran.P.P. (64 years years) Pandaraparambil Veedu, Kattipparuthi amsom, Valanchery desom & Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Saju George Thomas (42 years years) Ullappalli House, Vakayil Road, Chiyare Junction, Thrissur

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
The court found that the plaintiff's case is proved.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the cost of the proceedings from the defendant.
Evidence:
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to realize the cost of the proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the defendant for the repayment of the amount claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The memo indicating the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases