Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 24 of 2015

Case between Basheer et al vs Nafeesa et al regarding fixation of boundary.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.,B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Basheer and Fathima, are involved in a suit against the defendants, Nafeesa, Shukkoor, Usman Koya, Moideenkoya, Haneefa, and Salam, regarding the fixation of a boundary. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Basheer
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fathima
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nafeesa
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shukkoor
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usman Koya
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moideenkoya
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haneefa
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ninthosh. P.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Vipin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit for fixation of boundary
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Basheer et al vs Nafeesa et al regarding fixation of boundary.
Case Code Year
Case between Basheer et al vs Nafeesa et al regarding fixation of boundary.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Saidalavi vs Ayishakutty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Nahas.C.P. regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rasiya, Mumtaz vs Rukhiya, Sabariya, Ramli, Sameera (Meera), Dajani regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Original Suit Unknown