Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 177 OF 2016

Case between Rasiya, Mumtaz vs Rukhiya, Sabariya, Ramli, Sameera (Meera), Dajani regarding Partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2019-01-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Rasiya and Mumtaz, are seeking a partition against the defendants, Rukhiya, Sabariya, Ramli, Sameera, and Dajani. However, the plaintiffs were not represented in court during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for partition due to the plaintiffs' absence. The defendants' representative was present but there was no representation from the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for partition due to the plaintiffs' absence. The defendants' representative was present but there was no representation from the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rasiya
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mumtaz
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rukhiya
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabariya
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramli
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sameera (Meera)
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dajani
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ahmed kutty Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.E.M.Prakasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Shamsudheen Puthalath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P.Khaleel Ibrahim.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to non-representation of the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rasiya, Mumtaz vs Rukhiya, Sabariya, Ramli, Sameera (Meera), Dajani regarding Partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Rasiya, Mumtaz vs Rukhiya, Sabariya, Ramli, Sameera (Meera), Dajani regarding Partition.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 01/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Saidalavi vs Ayishakutty et al regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Nahas.C.P. regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Basheer et al vs Nafeesa et al regarding fixation of boundary.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Original Suit Unknown