Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 90 OF 2014

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-09-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji filed a suit for fixation of boundary and injunction. Both the plaintiff and defendants were absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties. The plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji (64 years years) Perumanna amsom Klari desom, Palachiramad, P.O.Edarikode. PIN – 676 501.

Defendants

Pathumma (67 years years) Muhammed (47 years years) Pathumma (45 years years) Nafeesa (43 years years) Safiya (41 years years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for fixation of boundary and injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases