Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 312 OF 2016

Case between Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children vs Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children regarding partition

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are the children of Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji, and they are involved in a partition suit against other children of the same deceased regarding the division of inherited properties. The suit seeks a preliminary decree for partition of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decreed the suit for partition and has detailed the shares allocated to each plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiffs and defendants will receive specified shares from the partition of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition and separate allotment of shares in the property.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has decreed the suit for partition and has detailed the shares allocated to each plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiffs and defendants will receive specified shares from the partition of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted the plaintiffs' claim in their written statement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The defendants filed written statement admitting the plaint claim. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: I. The plaint B schedule item No.1 to 3 property shall be divided into 48 (Forty eight) equal shares by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hamza
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Majeed
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammedunni
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Faizal
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayisakkutty
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammedali
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Khader
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Document No. 1083/1984, 2367/1985, 1543/1988 of Sub Registrar Office, Kalpakanchery, Document No. 2321/1976, 2322/1976, 2323/1976 and 635/1977 of Sub Registrar Office, Codaical.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gopi Kadavath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Shereef
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint B schedule properties.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree for partition is passed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Genealogical table
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the relationship between the parties.
Reference:
Plaint A
Document Type: Document from Sub Registrar Office
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership of property items 1 to 3.
Reference:
No.1083/1984, 2367/1985, 1543/1988
Document Type: Document from Sub Registrar Office
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership of property items 4 to 9.
Reference:
No.2321/1976, 2322/1976, 2323/1976, 635/1977
Document Type: Document from Sub Registrar Office and Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms ownership of property item 10.
Reference:
No.678/1977 and No.217/1980
Document Type: Document from Sub Registrar Office
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the execution of a deed in favor of the plaintiffs and defendants.
Reference:
No.5099/2010

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children vs Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children vs Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sulaikha vs Kadeeja Umma et al regarding declaration and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rasiya vs Peringattu Thodiyil Aboobacker Vaidyar et al regarding Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children vs Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon vs Bava regarding partition
MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession
MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won