Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 375 OF 2017

Case between Sulaikha vs Kadeeja Umma et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sulaikha is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property originally owned by Kadiyarakath Abullakutty Haji. The defendants, Kadeeja Umma and others, have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, declaring her right and title over the property and restraining the defendants from trespassing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the property.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, declaring her right and title over the property and restraining the defendants from trespassing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim in their written statement, providing grounds for a judgment on admission.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim in their written statement, providing grounds for a judgment on admission.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendants had admitted the plaint claim in the written statement, I am of the view that suit can be decreed on admission.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1 It is declared that the plaintiff has right and title over the plaint schedule property by virtue of Document No. 2678/2015 of SRO Tanur.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sulaikha
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kadeeja Umma
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Hameed
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima Suhara
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ismail
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaikha
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Jenm Assignment Deed Doc. No.2678/2015, Tax Receipt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.P.Hussain
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.I.P.Shajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is declared that the plaintiff has right and title over the plaint schedule property by virtue of Document No. 2678/2015 of SRO Tanur.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has right and title over the plaint schedule property by virtue of Document No. 2678/2015 of SRO Tanur.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained by way of perpetual prohibitory injunction, from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants are restrained by way of perpetual prohibitory injunction, from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and also from interfering with the peaceable enjoyment and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff produced his title deed No. 2678/2015, which is marked as Ext A1.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Declaration of title
Case Code
Case between Sulaikha vs Kadeeja Umma et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sulaikha vs Kadeeja Umma et al regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rasiya vs Peringattu Thodiyil Aboobacker Vaidyar et al regarding Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children vs Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children vs Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children regarding partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon vs Bava regarding partition
MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession
MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won