Case Summary
Case involves Ullattil Muhammed petitioning for a final decree for partition. The respondent did not respond, and an Advocate Commissioner was deputed to effect division of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Final decree for partition passed in favor of the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Advocate Commissioner effected division of property in tune with the preliminary decree.
Advocate Commissioner effected division of property in tune with the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Advocate Commissioner effected division of property in tune with the preliminary decree.
Advocate Commissioner effected division of property in tune with the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
The Advocate Commissioner has effected division of property in an equitable manner in tune with the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed. The decree schedule property divided into 2 equal shares.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bava
- Party Age
- 55
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report submitted by the Advocate Commissioner regarding the division of the property
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plan submitted by the Advocate Commissioner showing the allocation of plots to the parties
Reference:
Ext.C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon vs Bava regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon vs Bava regarding partition