Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 42 OF 2014

Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession

Court
MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-17
Duration
4 years 16 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/17/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Involves Suhara suing Ameer Faizal et al for boundary fixation, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession. Plaintiff claims ownership of a property purchased from Abdulla, facing disputes over boundaries and rights of way.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title over the disputed property.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title over the disputed property.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove title over the property in dispute.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o Thonikkadavath Hamza Haji, W/o Kunnathedath Thettammal Kamarudheen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunnthedath Thettammal Najeemudheen
Party Age
40
Relation
Power of Attorney holder
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ameer Faizal
Party Age
41
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Kalam
Party Age
47
Relation
Tharammal Parambil Hamza's child
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Kassim
Party Age
45
Relation
Tharammal Parambil Hamza's child
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Rafeekh
Party Age
38
Relation
Tharammal Parambil Hamza's child
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Firoz
Party Age
35
Plaintiffs Documents
Jenm Assignment deed No. 2774/1978, Jenm Assignment deed No. 60/2010, Copy of Complaint to SI, Tirur dated 20-1-2014, Copy of Assignment deed No. 1869/69, Copy of Partition Deed No. 1510/05
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Fixation of Boundary
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's claim for fixing the boundary of the property
Evidence:
Court found insufficient evidence to support boundary fixation
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's plea for a mandatory injunction to demolish defendant's wall
Evidence:
Insufficient evidence provided by plaintiff to support the injunction
Relief Type: Recovery of Possession
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's request for recovery of possession of property
Evidence:
Defendant's possession was deemed legal based on evidence presented

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing transfer of property from Abdulla to plaintiff's mother-in-law
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing transfer of property to plaintiff
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Complaint Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of complaint to SI regarding construction of compound wall by defendant
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the assignment deed related to the property
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of partition deed related to the property
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by the advocate commissioner regarding inspection of property
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch submitted by the advocate commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Commission sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch showing property details by the advocate commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by advocate commissioner stating inability to identify the property
Reference:
Ext.C4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by advocate commissioner regarding property details
Reference:
Ext.C5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by advocate commissioner on inspection of the property
Reference:
Ext.C6

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession
Case Code Year
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 03/17/2018 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between C.P.Pocker vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Kuttirayu's children regarding Partition.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Beevi et al vs Muhammedali et al regarding declaration.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Unknown
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Original Suit Unknown