Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 301 of 2017

Case between C.P.Pocker vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Kuttirayu's children regarding Partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.P.Pocker is the plaintiff seeking partition of property originally belonging to Kuttirayu, which has devolved to him and the defendants. The defendants have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement, leading to a judgment on admission.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed on admission, and the property will be divided into equal shares. The plaintiff and each defendant are entitled to 1/3 share of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 3 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and the preliminary decree is passed as follows: I. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 3 equal shares by metes and bounds. II. The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of said 3 shares. III. The defendants are entitled to get 1/3 share each out of said 3 shares.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

C.P.Pocker (68 years years) Cholakka Pulikkaparambil House, Thanalur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Alavikkutty (74 years years) Ozhur amsom Ayyaya desom, Tirur Taluk. Mammu Haji (67 years years) Ozhur amsom Ayyaya desom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 3 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed and the preliminary decree is passed as follows: I. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 3 equal shares by metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of said 3 shares.
Evidence:
II. The plaintiff is entitled to get 1 share out of said 3 shares.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are entitled to get 1/3 share each out of said 3 shares.
Evidence:
III. The defendants are entitled to get 1/3 share each out of said 3 shares.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The costs of the suit shall come out of the estate.
Evidence:
V. The costs of the suit shall come out of the estate.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Document
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document was referenced to explain the partition of the property among the heirs of Kuttirayu.
Reference:
No. 1541/2009

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases