Case Summary
Navas filed a complaint against Hashim for not honoring a cheque issued for repayment of a loan. The court found the accused not guilty due to the complainant's lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed and the accused, Hashim, was acquitted due to the complainant's non-appearance.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple opportunities.
The complainant failed to present evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant was neither present nor represented. The case was specifically posted for evidence on several posting dates.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result: The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Navas
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hashim
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Haskar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ochira N. Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Evidence:
The complaint is dismissed under section 256 (1) of Cr.P.C. and resultantly the accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST.NO.
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act