Case Summary
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner/plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed. The respondents remained absent despite notice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application to restore the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The application was allowed in the interest of justice.
The application was allowed in the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The application was allowed in the interest of justice.
The application was allowed in the interest of justice.
Supporting Evidence
Heard the petitioner. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence in order to meet the ends of justice, petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haridasan Potty
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vedikunnu Balaganapathy Temple
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Achu
- Relation
- Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit on file
Evidence:
I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be grant to the petitioner to proceed with the case. Hence in order to meet the ends of justice, petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024