Similar Cases
Based on: RP.No.274/2024 — Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Balaganapathy Temple et al regarding application to restore suit
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 187/2021
Case between Diety, Chavaru Appooppan Kavu Temple, et al vs Satheesan. G regarding temple management dispute
The plaintiffs are the Diety of Chavaru Appooppan Kavu Temple and its trust members, represented by Purushothaman. The case involves a dispute over the management of the temple which was settled through a joint compromise.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 186/2019
Case between Elambrakodu Chammaruthy Temple et al vs Raju et al regarding transfer of suit
Elambrakodu Chammaruthy Temple and its representatives are involved in a suit against Raju and others. The case concerns the transfer of the suit to the Hon'ble Sub-Court, Attingal.
Original Suit
Original Suit No. 427/2022
Case between Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple (Devaswom) et al vs Suresh Kumar. R. et al regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple represented by its Secretary S. Sujanalal against several defendants including Suresh Kumar. R. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 427/ 2022
Case between Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple et al vs Suresh Kumar. R. et al regarding dismissal of suit
This case involves Ayantavila Sree Mahalekshmi Temple and its Secretary Sujanalal as plaintiffs against Suresh Kumar. R. and others as defendants. The plaintiffs decided to not press the suit, resulting in its dismissal.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 428/2021
Case between Sarath K.S. vs Kozhikode Sri. Kanchi Kamakshi Amman Temple et al regarding suit dismissal.
Sarath K.S. filed a suit against Kozhikode Sri. Kanchi Kamakshi Amman Temple and its committee members. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.448/2020
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 270/2024 in OS.No.447/2023
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 45/2025
Case between Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple et al vs Pradeep et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, including Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple and its president, filed a suit for injunction. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and lack of representation.
Injunction
Defendant Won
RP. No.145/2023
Case between Thottakkattu Sreekrishna Swamy Temple vs Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam regarding petition dismissal for default.
This case involves a petition by Thottakkattu Sreekrishna Swamy Temple against Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner.
Petition
Defendant Won
OS. No. 259/2017
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, represented by the Trust President, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, Baburaj. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 1010/2022
Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
The case involves the petitioners/defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them. The suit addresses a dispute regarding a temple's management and the plaintiffs' right to perform certain activities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.612/2019
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity and others, filed a suit against defendant Priya Somarajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 827/2016
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
This case involves a dispute over the management of Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram between the petitioners, who claim to represent the temple's management committee, and the defendants, who assert their prior authority. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP. No. 287/2024
Case between Sudharsanan Pillai vs Lalithakumari Amma et al regarding restoration of petitions.
Sudharsanan Pillai filed a petition to restore a previous case. The respondents remained exparte during the hearing.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 24/2025
Case between Vishnu K.Vinod vs Fathima et al regarding lifting of attachment over property
Vishnu K.Vinod filed a petition to lift the attachment on his property claimed by Fathima. The case revolves around the validity of the attachment based on a demand promissory note disputed by the petitioner.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 83/2024 in RP 37/2022 OS 840/2018
Case between Sylesh vs Prasannakumari regarding petition dismissal for default.
The petitioner is Sylesh, who filed the RP against respondent Prasannakumari. The petition was dismissed for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 910/2016
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
The case involves plaintiff Sajai Kumar seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are managing the Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants are engaging in unauthorized construction on government land.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 232/2017
Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
The case involves Sumathi.N, who is seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property that she claims was improperly sold by her relatives, Sreelatha and Suresh. The defendants allegedly misled her into selling her property and have evicted her without fulfilling promises made to repurchase it for her.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 761/2024
Case between Kamala M.Kumar vs Rekha Sugathan regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Kamala M.Kumar, filed a suit against Rekha Sugathan for the recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- which was borrowed by the defendant for her daughter's marriage. The cheque issued by the defendant was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.283/2024
Case between Rani Chandrika vs Aneesh regarding setting aside an order
Aneesh, the original defendant, filed a petition to set aside an order in a previous case. Rani Chandrika, the original plaintiff, had not taken any steps in the matter.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.204/2024
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
The petitioner, Jayachandran Nair, filed a petition to review a previous order related to a civil matter. The respondents are M/s.Canara Bank, represented by their branch manager.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.23/2024
Case between Prasanna.P.L vs Shajimon.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree
The petitioner is Shajimon.J, represented by Santha Kumary.S, seeking to set aside an exparte decree against him. The respondent is Prasanna.P.L, the original plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 225/2024
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Anila Anilkumar regarding restoration of suit
The petitioner is the Branch Manager of Indian Bank, and the respondent is Anila Anilkumar. The petition was filed to restore a suit that was previously dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 90/2023
Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan.G., Gopalakrishnan regarding restoration of suit.
The case involves a petition by the Branch Manager of Canara Bank to restore a suit that was previously filed. The respondents in this case are Syam Krishnan.G. and Gopalakrishnan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.140/2023
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
John.K.J is the petitioner seeking a review of a prior order. The respondents include Sister Vinni Vetkkattel and others associated with health services.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.178/2024
Case between Sasikumar vs Sudarsanan regarding review of order.
Sasikumar, the proprietor of SK Holo Bricks, is the review petitioner. Sudarsanan is the review respondent. The petition was filed to review an earlier order, but it was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.215/2024
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Babu Sathyanandam et al regarding restoration of RP.
The petitioners/defendants are Babu Sathyanandam and Sajeev, while the respondent/plaintiff is Kerala Gramin Bank. They filed a petition to restore a revision petition on file.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.268/2024
Case between Arun.S et al vs Sajeev.K et al regarding setting aside an order
The petitioners, Arun.S and Saraswathy, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 23-10-24 and restore the suit. The respondents include Sajeev.K and others, all hailing from Thazhuthala Cherry, Kottiyam.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No. 223/2024
Case between Madanan Pillai.T. vs Vijayakumari.B. regarding review of an order.
Madanan Pillai.T. filed a review petition against an earlier order. The case involves issues relating to the review of the order dated 29/08/2024.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No. 191/2024
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Sajayan.M regarding restoration of suit
The case involves a petition filed by the Branch Manager of Indian Bank to restore a suit. The respondent is Sajayan.M, who was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 220/2024
Case between Mahadevar (Minor), Anandavaleeswaram Devaswom et al vs Santhosh Kumar regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
Santhosh Kumar is the petitioner/defendant seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against him. The plaintiffs include Mahadevar (Minor) and others, who are associated with the Anandavaleeswaram Devaswom and Travancore Devaswom Board.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.29/2025
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Charms Beauty Parlour et al regarding setting aside an order.
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the petitioner and M/s. Charms Beauty Parlour and its proprietor as respondents. The petitioner seeks to set aside a previous order and restore a related petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.233/2024
Case between Uma Maheswari et al vs Syamala Kumari.K regarding setting aside exparte decree
The petitioners/defendants are seeking to set aside an ex parte decree from June 7, 2022. They argue that they could not appear due to COVID-19 restrictions and only learned of the decree following the death of the original plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.284/2024
Case between Saraswathy vs B.Vinod regarding restoration of the suit
Saraswathy is the plaintiff who filed a petition to restore a suit, while B.Vinod is the defendant. The court decided to allow the plaintiff to proceed with the case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.26/2025
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Sajayan.M regarding restoration of suit
This case involves a petition filed by the Branch Manager of Indian Bank to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. The respondent remained exparte during the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.06/2024
Case between Policarp et al vs George Joseph et al regarding setting aside the order dated 29-09-2023.
The case involves the petitioners Policarp and Jetrud seeking to set aside a prior order and restore their suit. The respondents include George Joseph, Usha Job, Stanley Vincent, and Muthu Mani.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.180/2024
Case between State Bank of India vs Jyothi Sudhakar et al regarding restoration of a suit.
The case involves the State Bank of India seeking to restore a suit that had been previously dismissed. The respondents did not file objections or take steps, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.30/2025
Case between Sebastian et al vs Joy @ Ajeeriyos et al regarding restoring the suit
The case involves the petitioners Sebastian and Renju seeking to set aside an earlier order and restore their suit against the respondents Joy and Shijil. The petition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken towards the respondents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.89/2023
Case between Vijaya Bank now Bank of Baroda vs Ajitha regarding restoration of suit.
This case involves Vijaya Bank now Bank of Baroda as the petitioner/plaintiff and Ajitha as the respondent/defendant. The petitioner seeks to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.153/2024
Case between Sujatha vs Selvan regarding restoration of suit
Sujatha filed a petition to restore a suit, alleging necessity under procedural rules. Selvan is the respondent in this case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.100/2025
Case between A.Aloysius vs Sindhu.S et al regarding setting aside an earlier order
A.Aloysius, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 09-06-2025. The court dismissed the petition for default due to no fresh steps being taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.69/2025
Case between Binu.V. vs Syamkumar regarding review of prior order
Binu.V. filed a review petition to challenge a prior order while Syamkumar is the responding party. The court has allowed the petition for review without costs.
Review Petition
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.153/2023
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Athulya Anilkumar et al regarding restoration of suit.
The petitioner is the Branch Manager of Indian Bank seeking to restore a suit. The respondents are Athulya Anilkumar and Nisha Anto.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No.294/2024
Case between Abdul Kharim vs Navas regarding restoration of RP.
Abdul Kharim is the petitioner seeking to restore the RP on file. Navas is the respondent who did not file any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP.No.84/2024
Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Dileep regarding restoration of petition.
Abdul Rasheed filed a petition to restore a previous case on file. The petition was dismissed for default due to no fresh steps taken by the respondent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won