Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.448/2020

Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not remitting the Balance Court Fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not remitting the Balance Court Fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not remit the Balance Court Fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not remit the Balance Court Fee.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not remitted Balance Court Fee so far.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeevan.C.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Collector, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Deputy Collector (Land Assignment), Civil Station, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tahazildar, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Village Officer, Sakthikulangara
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Travancore Devaswom Board, represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.P.Gopalakrishna Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jani.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Niza Fazil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nizhad.E
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lekshmi.M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priya
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was filed for Declaration and Injunction.
Evidence:
plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The suit was filed for Declaration and Injunction.
Evidence:
plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Temple

Similar Cases

Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won