Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 1010/2022

Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
Case Code No.
1010
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the petitioners/defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them. The suit addresses a dispute regarding a temple's management and the plaintiffs' right to perform certain activities.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions filed to set aside the ex-parte decree were dismissed. The court found the petitioners to have acted with negligence leading to an inordinate delay in filing their applications.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions filed to set aside the ex-parte decree were dismissed. The court found the petitioners to have acted with negligence leading to an inordinate delay in filing their applications.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay in filing.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay in filing.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner had sufficient knowledge about the suit, and it is an act of negligence and inaction on the petitioner which led to an inordinate delay of 273 days for filing the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, these petitions are dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnakumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arundhathideviamma
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajendran Pillai
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vanchippuzhakkavu
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmavathi Amma
Party Age
83
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Satheeshkumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikala
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P.Gopala Krishna Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. D.B Ajayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition to set aside the exparte decree and restore the suit to file.
Evidence:
In the result, these petitions are dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Negligence
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Temple

Similar Cases

Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won