Similar Cases
Based on: OS 1010/2022 — Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No.448/2020
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 270/2024 in OS.No.447/2023
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 259/2017
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, represented by the Trust President, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, Baburaj. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.612/2019
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity and others, filed a suit against defendant Priya Somarajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 827/2016
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
This case involves a dispute over the management of Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram between the petitioners, who claim to represent the temple's management committee, and the defendants, who assert their prior authority. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 1013/2023
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
This case involves Bank of India as the plaintiff and Shibina. S and Shibu.S as defendants. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and is therefore not pressing the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 651/2022
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
The case involves the plaintiff, Krishnakumar, seeking the realization of money from the defendants, Raghavan and Chellamma. The suit was filed under Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1 to 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 303/2017
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Johnson. P, is seeking an injunction against multiple defendants including Sheela Sathyan and others. The counter claim was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 701/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
Canara Bank filed a suit for the realisation of money against Rajeena M and Manaf. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 489/2022
Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
The plaintiffs, Vishnu.P, Rajesh.P, and Sarasamma, filed a suit against the defendant Beena for declaration and to set aside a settlement deed and partition. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing despite multiple opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 816/2013
Case between Subhash Kumar vs Suresh Kumar et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary, Recovery of Possessions and Injunction
This case involves the plaintiff Subhash Kumar and multiple defendants including Suresh Kumar. The suit was related to the declaration, fixation of boundary, recovery of possessions, and an injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 324/2021
Case between Jiji.A. Miranta vs Vijayamma Williams et al regarding injunction
Jiji.A. Miranta is the plaintiff in this case seeking an injunction. The defendants include Vijayamma Williams and her children, Hemanth Stalin and Rohit Stalin.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 1196/2013
Case between Prasanna vs Valsala et al regarding fixation and declaration
This case involves the petitioner Prasanna and several respondents including Valsala, Vimala, and others regarding a petition for fixation and declaration under the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner was absent and the petition was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 181/2017
Case between Sheelabhayi @ Sheelakumari et al vs Syamala Kumari et al regarding appointment of a commissioner and surveyor
The plaintiffs, Sheelabhayi @ Sheelakumari and Jisha, filed a petition for appointing a commissioner and surveyor. The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioner was absent and did not comply with the previous order.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 86/2015
Case between Rajan vs Sasidharan et al regarding partition.
The petitioner, Rajan, filed a petition for partition. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 526/2025
Case between Krishna L vs Akhelesh J Amarjyothi regarding injunction
Krishna L, a lady entrepreneur, seeks to restrain Akhelesh J Amarjyothi from unlawfully evicting her from her fitness center after an alleged criminal trespass. The defendant claims the plaintiff has no lawful possession due to a revoked licence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 675/2021
Case between Shinu et al vs Harinathan et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, Shinu, Sini, and Kamalamma, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, Harinathan, Anu, and Satheesh, concerning their rights over a pathway. The plaintiffs claim ownership and express concerns over the defendants' actions to pave the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 675/2021
Case between Shinu et al vs Harinathan et al regarding cancellation of certain clause in title deeds and for injunction.
The petitioners, Shinu and others, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, Harinathan and others, who they claim are improperly trying to pave bricks on a pathway they believe is under their ownership. The defendants argue that the pathway is government land and they have rights to it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 810/2023
Case between B Santhosh Kumar vs Sindhu Kumari regarding declaration and temporary prohibitory injunction.
The case involves B Santhosh Kumar, the petitioner, seeking a declaration of his title to a property and a temporary injunction against his sister, Sindhu Kumari, who has allegedly trespassed onto his property. The petitioner claims to have inherited the property through a gift deed from his deceased father.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 824/2024
Case between Raju et al vs Madhu et al regarding injunction
The case involves Raju and Kamalamma as plaintiffs, seeking an injunction against Madhu and Bindu, the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have constructed a house on their property without paying the full sale consideration, resulting in a dispute over the possession and potential sale of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 346/2024
Case between Rajan Edward vs Anupama regarding injunction
Rajan Edward filed a petition for an injunction against Anupama, regarding the usage of a pathway claimed to be obstructed by the defendants. The case involves allegations of encroachment by the defendants' father and subsequent actions taken by both parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 145/2023
Case between Aji George vs Harilal regarding review of order
Aji George, represented by Power of Attorney Holder James.S, filed a review petition against Harilal regarding an earlier order. The case involves a review of the order dated 21/06/2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 422/2025
Case between Vishnu V.P. vs Mini S. Sreekumar et al regarding realization of money
This case involves Vishnu V.P. as the plaintiff who lent money to the defendants, Mini S. Sreekumar and Santhamma Amma, based on their assurance of repayment. The case was filed to secure an interim order of attachment due to the defendants' failure to repay the loan.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 324/2025
Case between Vasanthakumari vs Bindhu regarding attachment of property
Vasanthakumari, the plaintiff, filed a petition for attachment of property against Bindhu, the defendant, due to an unpaid loan. The defendant contested the claim, stating that the promissory note was forged and disputed ownership of the property in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 127/2023
Case between Edwin R et al vs Sheeja Micheal et al regarding jurisdictional matters.
The plaintiffs, led by Edwin R, filed a suit against the defendants, including Sheeja Micheal, concerning a matter that the court determined it lacked jurisdiction over. The court directed the case to be presented before the Munsiff Court, Kollam for adjudication.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 83/2016
Case between M.Abdul Majeed et al vs Faisal regarding petition dismissal for default.
The case involves Decree Holders M.Abdul Majeed and others against Judgment Debtor Faisal. The petition filed by the Decree Holders was dismissed for default as there was no compliance with the previous order.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 408/2024
Case between Ravi vs Sathyasheelan et al regarding temporary injunction and property rights
Ravi, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Sathyasheelan and others, who are relatives of his late wife Santhakumari, regarding properties owned by her. The plaintiff claims rights over these properties following his wife's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 651/2025
Case between Remadevi Amma vs Seenamol regarding suit not pressed
Remadevi Amma filed a suit against Seenamol. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 155/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Nishamol.A.S et al regarding suit not pressed.
This suit is filed by Canara Bank for consideration under CPC. The court delivered a judgment stating that the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 778/2021
Case between Asha vs Kishore, Shylaja regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Asha filed a suit against Kishore and Shylaja for a perpetual prohibitory injunction. The matter was settled between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 290/2025
Case between Ahalya M vs Aneesh M regarding injunction
Ahalya M, the petitioner, seeks a permanent injunction to prevent Aneesh M from creating rights for third parties over a shared access pathway. The respondent, Aneesh M, contests the petition, claiming ownership rights.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 659/2020
Case between Nazeema Beevi vs Subha et al regarding injunction and declaration of easement right
Nazeema Beevi filed this suit against Subha and others for a declaration of her easement right and a permanent injunction regarding a pathway. The respondents contest her claim, arguing that no such pathway exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 774/2001
Case between Suresh Thampi vs Ponnan .P regarding restoration of execution petition
The case involves Suresh Thampi, the decree holder, seeking to restore an execution petition that was dismissed for default in 2015 due to illness and personal circumstances. Ponnan .P, the judgment debtor, filed objections claiming the delay was not justified.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 650/2024
Case between Jebin. J vs Vitus Benjamin regarding breach of contract for construction work.
Jebin. J, the plaintiff, filed a petition for conditional attachment against Vitus Benjamin, the defendant, claiming unpaid dues for construction work completed under a written agreement. The defendant contested the claim, asserting that there was only an oral agreement and that the plaintiff's work was incomplete.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP 91/2025
Case between P. Ashokan vs Kerala State et al regarding setting aside exparte decree
The case involves P. Ashokan, who is the original plaintiff, and the Kerala State along with other defendants. The defendants filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree passed due to their non-appearance.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 922/2015
Case between Yamuna.ID vs Sreeja et al regarding setting aside sale deed and mandatory injunction.
Yamuna.ID, the petitioner, filed a case against Sreeja, Sujith, Retnamma, and Sheeba for setting aside a sale deed and seeking a mandatory injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance, attributed to her advocate's death.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 256/2024
Case between Sulochana vs Sini.S regarding realisation of money.
This case involves Sulochana, the plaintiff, who has filed a suit for the realisation of money against Sini.S, the defendant. Both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 862/2023
Case between Chandran Pillai vs Babu et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves a plaintiff, Chandran Pillai, who filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendants, Babu and Bindhu. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 106/2023
Case between Sindhu vs Rajitha regarding injunction
Sindhu and Bindhu are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Rajitha and Suresh. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 580/2020
Case between Janardhanan vs Raju regarding review of order
Janardhanan filed a counter claim petition against Raju to review a previous order and restore the suit. The court found there were issues with the original case leading to its rejection.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 771/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
This case involves a suit filed by Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha and Ramesan G against Tripunithura Municipality. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, which resulted in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1437/2019
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs are Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom and its Bharana Samithi, while the defendant is Jaya Gireesh. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' repeated absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1263/2017
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
The plaintiff, Aiswarya Renjith, was absent along with her counsel during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit due to non-prosecution since no proof affidavits or applications were filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1298/2022
Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
The case involves P.G. Victor as the plaintiff and Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple as the defendant. The court delivered a judgment approving a mediation report between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1484/2022
Case between Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
This case involves Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple and its representatives against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won