Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by Edwin R, filed a suit against the defendants, including Sheeja Micheal, concerning a matter that the court determined it lacked jurisdiction over. The court directed the case to be presented before the Munsiff Court, Kollam for adjudication.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application IA 7/2025 and determined it lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over the case.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the matter fell outside its pecuniary jurisdiction.
The court found that the matter fell outside its pecuniary jurisdiction.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the matter fell outside its pecuniary jurisdiction.
The court found that the matter fell outside its pecuniary jurisdiction.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined it lacked pecuniary jurisdiction over the case involved.
Judgment Evidence:
IA 7/2025 is allowed. Since the court lacks pecuniary jurisdiction to adjudicate the lis involved in the suit, the plaint is returned for presenting the same before the Munsiff Court, Kollam.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Edwin R
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinod Edwin
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Deepa Terry
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Terry Micheal
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dolly
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sheeja Micheal @ Sheeja P Nair
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Micheal
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- H/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pranav @ Pranav Micheal
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mercy Sebastian
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abhilal Raj
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- Son in law of
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Maranadu G Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ananthakrishnan J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaint is returned for presenting the same before the Munsiff Court, Kollam (Junior division) for adjudication.
Evidence:
IA 7/2025 is allowed. Since the court lacks pecuniary jurisdiction to adjudicate the lis involved in the suit,the plaint is returned for presenting the same before the Munsiff Court, Kollam (Junior division) for adjudication.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023