Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 1013/2023

Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration
Case Code No.
1013
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Bank of India as the plaintiff and Shibina. S and Shibu.S as defendants. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and is therefore not pressing the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed following the settlement of the matter between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed following the settlement of the matter between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter has been settled.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter has been settled.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff’s counsel submitted that matter settled between the parties, hence not pressing the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibina. S
Party Age
25
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu.S
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anu.V.U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Niaz. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sathya Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bipin.S. Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajith A.Khader
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Ushar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C. Gireesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff's counsel submitted that matter settled between the parties, hence not pressing the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff’s counsel submitted that matter settled between the parties, hence not pressing the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Nishamol.A.S et al regarding suit not pressed.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Indian Overseas Bank, Chemmakkad vs Sunil.L.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Hussain.A et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won