Case Summary
The petitioner, Rajan, filed a petition for partition. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner and their advocate.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was absent, and no representation was made.
The petitioner was absent, and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasidharan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Udhayabhanu
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajamma
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. P. Gopalakrishnapillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition filed by the petitioner for partition
Evidence:
Petitioner absent, no representation. Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2015