Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 816/2013

Case between Subhash Kumar vs Suresh Kumar et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary, Recovery of Possessions and Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-11 years 8 months
Case Code No.
816
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiff Subhash Kumar and multiple defendants including Suresh Kumar. The suit was related to the declaration, fixation of boundary, recovery of possessions, and an injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled through a judicial settlement with both parties agreeing to a survey of the property. A decree has been passed based on the settlement and the survey plan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree based on the survey plan prepared by the Surveyor.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled through a judicial settlement with both parties agreeing to a survey of the property. A decree has been passed based on the settlement and the survey plan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Both parties reached a lawful compromise that was accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Both parties signed in the compromise and it’s terms and conditions are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

A decree is passed based on the above settlement and the plan prepared by the Surveyor.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subhash Kumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Kumar
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayasree Kumari
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leena @ Bindu
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laina @ Beena
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thulaseedharan Pillai
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Survey plan prepared and submitted by Sri.Sooraj.S.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.I. Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Sethunathan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Riyaz.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Unnikrishnan V.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Ramesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree is passed based on the settlement and the plan prepared by the Surveyor.
Evidence:
As such, on the basis of the above settlement and the plan prepared by the Surveyor a decree is passed.
Relief Type: Boundary Fixation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Both parties agreed to construct a boundary as per the survey plan.
Evidence:
As per the plan both parties agreed to construct boundary.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Both parties agreed not to raise any further disputes regarding the case.
Evidence:
Both the plaintiff and the defendant have agreed that they will not raise any further disputes regarding the case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the survey plan prepared by the Surveyor for the settlement of the property boundary.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2013

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 07/17/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won