Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 778/2021

Case between Asha vs Kishore, Shylaja regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 8 months
Case Code No.
778
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Asha filed a suit against Kishore and Shylaja for a perpetual prohibitory injunction. The matter was settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled as both parties signed a compromise agreement. The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled as both parties signed a compromise agreement. The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms and conditions of the compromise were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms and conditions of the compromise were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Both parties signed in the compromise and its terms and conditions are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 4/25 allowed and compromise recorded. Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Asha
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manju.C
Party Age
40
Relation
Power of Attorney Holder
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kishore
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shylaja
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of agreement and Ext.C1 plan.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Sreesivan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Geetha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nisha.L.Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Perpetual prohibitory injunction as part of the suit decree.
Evidence:
Hence IA 4/25 allowed and compromise recorded. Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The plan is part of the decree as per the compromise agreement.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam, Kerala
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 02/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won