Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 422/2025

Case between Vishnu V.P. vs Mini S. Sreekumar et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-08-08
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months
Case Code No.
422
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Vishnu V.P. as the plaintiff who lent money to the defendants, Mini S. Sreekumar and Santhamma Amma, based on their assurance of repayment. The case was filed to secure an interim order of attachment due to the defendants' failure to repay the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff without costs. The petitioner was not entitled to the attachment of the property as asked.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff without costs. The petitioner was not entitled to the attachment of the property as asked.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff admitted to occupying the mortgaged property and had not fulfilled the conditions of the mortgage deed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff admitted to occupying the mortgaged property and had not fulfilled the conditions of the mortgage deed.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner admitted that he is residing in the petition schedule building and also the respondent alleges that this is a mortgage.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vishnu V.P.
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini S. Sreekumar
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhamma Amma
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original cheque No.118104, Return memo outward clearing from Bandhan Bank Ltd., Legal notice, Postal receipts, Agreement deed
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Unnikrishnan S.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maranadu G.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ahalya Manohar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for an interim order of attachment
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original cheque related to the transaction
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the cheque was dishonoured
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to defendants regarding the dishonoured cheque
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the loan agreement and terms
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Loan agreement dispute
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
KOLLAM
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won