Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 342/2022

Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration
approximately-3 years 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in part, restraining the defendants from encroaching upon the temple and disturbing its activities. The plaintiffs were also entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule temple and causing any disturbance to the peaceful worship.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in part, restraining the defendants from encroaching upon the temple and disturbing its activities. The plaintiffs were also entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs succeeded in proving their case with the evidence provided, which was not rebutted by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs succeeded in proving their case with the evidence provided, which was not rebutted by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts. A1 to A3 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiffs have succeeded in proving their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this suit is decreed in part as follows: (I) The defendants and their associates are hereby restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule temple and from causing any manner of disturbance to the peaceful worship and management of the plaintiff temple.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ganesh.T
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhasuran
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Selvakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Festival notice of plaintiff temple, Account book of the plaintiff temple, Minutes book of the plaintiff temple.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sujan.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Rammohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dhanya M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mundakkal B.Anoob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kanav Raj P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aromal S.Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amal Krishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants and their associates are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule temple and causing disturbance.
Evidence:
the defendants and their associates are hereby restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule temple and from causing any manner of disturbance to the peaceful worship and management of the plaintiff temple.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Festival Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was used to establish the temple's activities and was marked as evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Account book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was presented to provide financial records of the plaintiff temple.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Minutes Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was used to reflect the proceedings and decisions of committee meetings.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Disturbance to worship
Case Code
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 04/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Temple

Similar Cases

Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won