Case Summary
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner did not appear before the court.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner was absent and did not take steps against the respondents.
Petitioner was absent and did not take steps against the respondents.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner was absent and did not take steps against the respondents.
Petitioner was absent and did not take steps against the respondents.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner not represented and called absent. No steps seen taken against the respondents.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haridasan Potty
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple
- Relation
- represented by its President
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Achu
- Relation
- Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Biju.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition to set aside the order and restore the suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
Case Code Year
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order