Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 408/2024

Case between Ravi vs Sathyasheelan et al regarding temporary injunction and property rights

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-10-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Code No.
408
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ravi, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Sathyasheelan and others, who are relatives of his late wife Santhakumari, regarding properties owned by her. The plaintiff claims rights over these properties following his wife's death.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, granting the plaintiff an interim injunction against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, granting the plaintiff an interim injunction against the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored him.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the petitioner has every right over the properties of his deceased wife as there was no will executed by her in favor of anyone.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ravi
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathyasheelan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujatha
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chakravani
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajaykumar
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No.2228/2019, Land Tax receipt, Settlement deed No.175/2015, Marriage Certificate, Death Certificate
Defendants Documents
Judgment in OP(HMA) 134/2016, Petition filed before the Hon’ble family court vide OP No.266/2016

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ullas Kumar U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dhanya Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shabana Sunil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Sethunathan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the scheduled properties.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale deed No.2228/2019 of Kannanalloor SRO establishes ownership of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt dated 15/05/2024 demonstrates the plaintiff's upkeep and payment of taxes for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement deed No.175/2015 of Kannanalloor SRO shows legal establishment of ownership for the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt dated 15/05/2023 further supports the continuous payment of taxes for properties owned by the plaintiff's late wife.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marriage Certificate proves the legal relationship and birthright over the properties for the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death Certificate verifies the date of demise of the plaintiff's wife, which is crucial for the succession claim.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Judgment in OP(HMA) 134/2016 indicates legal controversies surrounding the plaintiff's marriage and property claims.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Petition filed before the Family Court for recovery of gold ornaments and money illustrates ongoing family disputes impacting claims on property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt from the respondent's side showing ownership or claims over the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Joint Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Joint petition filed under Sec. 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act demonstrates attempts at resolving marital disputes legally.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Judgment in OP(HMA) 18/2023 reveals further legal proceedings involving the plaintiff and his wife.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Judgment in OP(FC) 504/2023 illustrates the outcomes of family law disputes relevant to property claims.
Reference:
Ext.B6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won