Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 810/2023

Case between B Santhosh Kumar vs Sindhu Kumari regarding declaration and temporary prohibitory injunction.

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Code No.
810
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves B Santhosh Kumar, the petitioner, seeking a declaration of his title to a property and a temporary injunction against his sister, Sindhu Kumari, who has allegedly trespassed onto his property. The petitioner claims to have inherited the property through a gift deed from his deceased father.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff, determining that a prima facie case was not established and the balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff, determining that a prima facie case was not established and the balance of convenience did not favor the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of a prima facie case and the balance of convenience not favoring the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed due to lack of a prima facie case and the balance of convenience not favoring the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent contended that the petitioner suppressed material facts regarding the subject matter, and it was determined that the petition was not maintainable.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is dismissed. The plaintiff is directed to pay the costs of this application to the Defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B Santhosh Kumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu Kumari
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of settlement deed No.265/1998, Certified copy of cancellation deed No. 235/2012, Tax receipt No.1075305 of Mangad Village
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of claim application filed by the defendant in EP 235/15, Certified copy of execution petition filed against the plaintiff before the Hon’ble District and Sessions Court, Kollam, Encumbrance Certificate issued from SRO, Kilikolloor.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Boris Poul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adarsh V.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anandu P Anandh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ganga Santhosh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ramesh Kumar R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lekha Vamadhevan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nithin S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Temporary prohibitory injunction as sought by the petitioner.
Evidence:
In such a situation, I am not inclined to allow the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed establishing petitioner's title.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cancellation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of cancellation deed alleged to be created by coercion.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt evidencing the petitioner's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Claim Application
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of claim application indicating the defendant's claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Execution Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of execution petition filed against the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Encumbrance certificate evidencing the property status as of the specified date.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Encumbrance certificate evidencing the property status as of the specified later date.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won