Case Summary
Yamuna.ID, the petitioner, filed a case against Sreeja, Sujith, Retnamma, and Sheeba for setting aside a sale deed and seeking a mandatory injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance, attributed to her advocate's death.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions filed to restore the suit and condone the delay were dismissed. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support her claims.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the application.
The petitioner did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the application.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the application.
The petitioner did not demonstrate sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the application.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, these petitions are dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Yamuna.ID
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o.S.Sudharshanan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreeja
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o.Sujith
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujith
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o.Sukumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Retnamma
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- W/o.Sukumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sheeba
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o.Sukumaran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Anaz.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Parambil S.Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.Sugathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Geetha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nisha L Prakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petitioner sought to condone the delay of 2417 days in filing the petition to restore the suit.
Evidence:
the petitioner has failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay. So, I am not inclined to allow the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2015