Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1437/2019

Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom and its Bharana Samithi, while the defendant is Jaya Gireesh. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' repeated absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and not interested in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiffs were absent and not interested in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff absence indicated lack of interest in the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff absence indicated lack of interest in the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent repeatedly. Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mukkottil Bhavathy Devaswom Bharana Samithi
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaya Gireesh
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.V. Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raju.V. Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Temple

Similar Cases

Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M.C. Antony vs The Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Manmadhan M.R et al vs Balabhadra Temple Managing Committee et al regarding temple management and administration.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won