Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India seeking to restore a suit that had been previously dismissed. The respondents did not file objections or take steps, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the suit has been dismissed due to lack of action and substantiating documents from the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Petition dismissed due to lack of service of notice to all respondents and failure to substantiate the claim.
Petition dismissed due to lack of service of notice to all respondents and failure to substantiate the claim.
Why Defendant Won:
Petition dismissed due to lack of service of notice to all respondents and failure to substantiate the claim.
Petition dismissed due to lack of service of notice to all respondents and failure to substantiate the claim.
Supporting Evidence
No documents produced from the side of the petitioner to substantiate his claim. Moreover, notice to respondents 2 and 3 not seen served also, and it shows the latches on the part of the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jyothi Sudhakar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sony Bushar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arun Kumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Vinod.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petitioner seeks to restore the suit on file.
Evidence:
For the reasons stated above, the petition is only liable to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024