Case Summary
The petitioner is Shajimon.J, represented by Santha Kumary.S, seeking to set aside an exparte decree against him. The respondent is Prasanna.P.L, the original plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the exparte decree was allowed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition allowed. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 30th day of January, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna.P.L
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajimon.J
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santha Kumary.S
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajith A.Khader
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.Reghu Varma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition allowed to set aside the exparte decree dated 20-12-2023
Evidence:
Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024