Case Summary
Sudharsanan Pillai filed a petition to restore a previous case. The respondents remained exparte during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed in the interest of justice.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Justice demands one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner.
Justice demands one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Justice demands one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner.
Justice demands one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interest of justice I am of the view that justice demands one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudharsanan Pillai
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lalithakumari Amma
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinod Sasidharan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.L.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition to restore RP.82/2024
Evidence:
Hence Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudharsanan Pillai vs Lalithakumari Amma et al regarding restoration of petitions.
Case Code Year
Case between Sudharsanan Pillai vs Lalithakumari Amma et al regarding restoration of petitions.