Case Summary
Vishnu K.Vinod filed a petition to lift the attachment on his property claimed by Fathima. The case revolves around the validity of the attachment based on a demand promissory note disputed by the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed Vishnu K.Vinod's petition to lift the attachment on his property, stating that the attachment was unjustified as he was the rightful owner prior to the order.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was the absolute owner of the property prior to the attachment order.
The petitioner was the absolute owner of the property prior to the attachment order.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was the absolute owner of the property prior to the attachment order.
The petitioner was the absolute owner of the property prior to the attachment order.
Supporting Evidence
On the perusal of Ext.A1 and A2, the petitioner is the absolute owner and possession of petition schedule property onwards 09/10/2024.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Communicate the order to SRO and V.O concerned.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vishnu K.Vinod
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Latha Kumari P
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arathy
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Saledeed No.1956/24, Land tax receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D. Baijukumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Silpa U.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishna Kumar G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition to lift the attachment over the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, I am inclined to allow the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No.1956/24 indicating transfer of property to the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment related to the property tax, supporting the claim of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025