Case Summary
The case involves Roopesh T.S. and Hynse Aprem, who are both plaintiffs and defendants in two separate suits. They have reached a compromise, which the court has recorded and decreed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded a compromise between the parties and decreed the suit in terms of that compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise terms were found to be lawful.
The compromise terms were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roopesh T.S.
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hynse Aprem
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D. Muralidhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Kurian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
The terms of the compromise are lawful. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Plan prepared by Rajendran Nair K.N. was recorded as part of the decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022