Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Radha and Ratheesh, are involved in a case against the defendant, Rajani, regarding a suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and not being ready for evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and proof affidavit was not filed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radha
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ratheesh
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajani
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Gaganan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Malu Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K.Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Seema K.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chandrababu Edadan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022