Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 232/2017

Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sumathi.N, who is seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property that she claims was improperly sold by her relatives, Sreelatha and Suresh. The defendants allegedly misled her into selling her property and have evicted her without fulfilling promises made to repurchase it for her.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff's claims were barred by limitation and that the third defendant was a bona fide purchaser.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit, concluding that the plaintiff's claims were barred by limitation and that the third defendant was a bona fide purchaser.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as it was found to be filed after the expiration of the limitation period for such claims.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit is barred by the law of limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sumathi.N
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreelatha
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jijimol
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Death certificate of Gopinadhan, Certified copy of Sale Deed No.2386/2013, Copy of receipt issued from women Cell, Copy of receipt issued from office of the District Police Chief, Certified copy of order of the Kerala State HRMP, Copy of complaint lodged before the District Collector.
Defendants Documents
Copy of Sale Deed No.817/2013, Online copy of Sale Deed No.817/13, Building Permit, True copy of Possession Certificate.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith A. Khader
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Sethunathen Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a declaration of her ownership of the property.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff claimed recovery of possession of the property.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the death of the plaintiff's husband, which is pertinent to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the sale of property from the plaintiff to the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt from Women's Cell
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the plaintiff's complaints regarding the defendants' actions.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt from District Police Chief
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents complaints filed by the plaintiff for legal assistance.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Order of the Kerala State Human Rights Commission
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Illustrates a formal recognition of the plaintiff's grievances.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Complaint to the District Collector
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details another complaint filed by the plaintiff regarding her situation.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Contested sale deed relevant to the third defendant's claims.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the basis for the third defendant's claim of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Building Permit
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Demonstrates improvements made on the property by the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proves the third defendant's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Another possession certificate relevant to the third defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Case Code Year
Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sylesh vs Prasannakumari regarding petition dismissal for default.
Court of Munsiff, Kollam
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kamala M.Kumar vs Rekha Sugathan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vishnu K.Vinod vs Fathima et al regarding lifting of attachment over property
Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sudharsanan Pillai vs Lalithakumari Amma et al regarding restoration of petitions.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Balaganapathy Temple et al regarding application to restore suit
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Original Suit Plaintiff Won