Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 232/2017 — Case between Sumathi.N vs Sreelatha et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
RP.No.274/2024
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Balaganapathy Temple et al regarding application to restore suit
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner/plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously ordered to be dismissed. The respondents remained absent despite notice.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP. No. 287/2024
Case between Sudharsanan Pillai vs Lalithakumari Amma et al regarding restoration of petitions.
Sudharsanan Pillai filed a petition to restore a previous case. The respondents remained exparte during the hearing.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 24/2025
Case between Vishnu K.Vinod vs Fathima et al regarding lifting of attachment over property
Vishnu K.Vinod filed a petition to lift the attachment on his property claimed by Fathima. The case revolves around the validity of the attachment based on a demand promissory note disputed by the petitioner.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 761/2024
Case between Kamala M.Kumar vs Rekha Sugathan regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Kamala M.Kumar, filed a suit against Rekha Sugathan for the recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- which was borrowed by the defendant for her daughter's marriage. The cheque issued by the defendant was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 83/2024 in RP 37/2022 OS 840/2018
Case between Sylesh vs Prasannakumari regarding petition dismissal for default.
The petitioner is Sylesh, who filed the RP against respondent Prasannakumari. The petition was dismissed for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 312 OF 2016
Case between Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children vs Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji's children regarding partition
The plaintiffs are the children of Kalappattil deceased Kunhimoideen Haji, and they are involved in a partition suit against other children of the same deceased regarding the division of inherited properties. The suit seeks a preliminary decree for partition of the property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 42 OF 2014
Case between Suhara vs Ameer Faizal et al regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession
Involves Suhara suing Ameer Faizal et al for boundary fixation, mandatory injunction, and recovery of possession. Plaintiff claims ownership of a property purchased from Abdulla, facing disputes over boundaries and rights of way.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 2250 OF 2018
Case between Ullattil Muhammed @ Kunhimon vs Bava regarding partition
Case involves Ullattil Muhammed petitioning for a final decree for partition. The respondent did not respond, and an Advocate Commissioner was deputed to effect division of property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 72 OF 2016
Case between Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children vs Karatt Thandan Valappil Moideenkutty Haji's children regarding partition
The plaintiffs are the children of Late Moideenkutty Haji who are seeking a partition of the property inherited from their father. The defendants are also children of Late Moideenkutty Haji and are contesting the partition.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 23 OF 2016
Case between Rasiya vs Peringattu Thodiyil Aboobacker Vaidyar et al regarding Partition
Rasiya, the plaintiff, is seeking a partition of the properties belonging to her deceased father, Aboobacker. The defendants are Aboobacker's children and relatives who are contesting the claims.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 375 OF 2017
Case between Sulaikha vs Kadeeja Umma et al regarding declaration and injunction
Sulaikha is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property originally owned by Kadiyarakath Abullakutty Haji. The defendants, Kadeeja Umma and others, have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 301 of 2017
Case between C.P.Pocker vs Cholakka Pulikkaparambil Kuttirayu's children regarding Partition.
C.P.Pocker is the plaintiff seeking partition of property originally belonging to Kuttirayu, which has devolved to him and the defendants. The defendants have admitted the plaint claim through their written statement, leading to a judgment on admission.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 279 OF 2015
Case between Gopakumari vs Gopalan et al regarding Partition
The plaintiff Gopakumari and the defendants, who are her siblings, are involved in a dispute over the partition of inherited property belonging to their deceased mother, Lakshmi. The suit seeks a decree for partition as the plaintiff claims that the defendants, particularly D1, have not managed the property correctly.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 67 OF 2015
Case between Ayisha vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession
The case involves Ayisha, the plaintiff, seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of her property that she claims was fraudulently assigned to Muhammedkutty, the deceased original defendant, who created a forged document. After discovering this, she filed the suit to cancel the document and regain control of her property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 149/2018
Case between Devadas et al vs Deputy Tahsildhar regarding declaration and granting a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Devadas and Ambika, purchased properties and sought a declaration against the Deputy Tahsildhar of the Kerala Financial Corporation to prevent the auction of these properties due to earlier encumbrances. The defendants argued the sale deed was not valid and that the properties were rightfully attached for recovery of government dues.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 446/ 2018
Case between Ravi vs Ashokan et al regarding declaration and consequential permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Ravi and additional plaintiff Rajani, are siblings suing their brothers Ashokan and Sasi, and sister Remani over property rights following their parents' death. They seek to declare a settlement deed void and partition the property.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 32/2022
Case between Lipinjan et al vs Lohithan regarding property dispute
The plaintiffs, Lipinjan and others, are involved in a property dispute with the defendant Lohithan. The parties settled their disputes through mediation, and the court has decreed the division of property among the plaintiffs and the defendant.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 439/2023
Case between Muhammed Gasini et al vs Vaheeda Beevi regarding partition
The case involves a partition of property among the plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Muhammed Sidni, and the defendant, Vaheeda Beevi. The plaintiffs claim their rights over the property after the death of their mother, Mrs. Majida Beevi.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 93/2023
Case between Muhammed Khalifa et al vs Babu regarding partition of property
Muhammed Khalifa, a minor, is suing Babu for partition of property previously owned by their deceased grandmother, Smt. Subhadra Amma. The plaintiff claims half share of the properties due to his father’s relationship with the plaintiff's mother.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 05 / 2020
Case between Shabna.K.P vs Khadeejumma et al regarding easement by prescription
The case involves Shabna.K.P claiming prescriptive easement rights over a pathway from the defendants, Khadeejumma and others. The plaintiff asserts prior usage of the path for over 70 years, while the defendants contest the claim.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 357/2021
Case between Prakasini K. vs Kamala et al regarding cancellation of document and partition
Prakasini K. filed a suit against Kamala and others for the cancellation of a partition deed and for partition of certain properties. The parties are siblings disputing their inheritance rights over the property left by their deceased father.
Original Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 546/2017
Case between Madayi Usha et al vs Madayi Sivanandan et al regarding partition of properties
The plaintiffs are Madayi Usha and Madayi Meenakumari, and the defendants include Madayi Sivanandan and others regarding the partition of certain properties. The suit seeks to divide the ownership of properties inherited from their parents.
Original Suit
Partial
OS 100/2020
Case between Raveendran Nair et al vs Mohanan regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Raveendran Nair, Sukumaran Nair, and Sadasivan Nair, are seeking to fix the boundary of their property and to obtain injunctions against the defendant, Mohanan, who they allege has unlawfully damaged their land. The defendant denies the allegations and claims the plaintiffs have also engaged in illegal activities.
Original Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1485/2014
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff, Meera Biju, employed in the United Kingdom, seeks declaration and injunction regarding her easement rights over property in Mundakkal Village. The defendants include V.Jayaprakash and State of Kerala officials, who contested her claim over the access to her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 676/2018
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
The case involves V.M.Jayaprakasan and additional plaintiffs seeking a permanent injunction against Ushakumary and others to prevent obstruction of boundary wall construction on their property. The plaintiffs claim ownership and the defendants are accused of attempting to encroach on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 01/2023
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
The case involves Sharon.S.P and Suvarnna Kumari.S as plaintiffs against Honey.S.P regarding a partition of property inherited from their deceased father, C.P. Paramanandan. They seek a decree for partition of the plaint schedule properties as co-sharers.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 791/2015
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
This suit is filed for declaration and partition by Thankamma, the mother of the deceased Biju, against his wife Suja and their minor daughter Anjana. The plaintiff claims a share in the properties and benefits received by the defendants from Biju's death.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 354/2017
Case between Rajesh vs Sarada et al regarding Final Decree for Partition
The case involves petitioners Rajesh and Dhanya seeking a final decree for partition of a property. The court has accepted the commission report for the partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 761/2021
Case between Rugmini Amma vs Mathew.K.Alex regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Rugmini Amma filed a suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against Mathew.K.Alex, claiming ownership over a property based on a previous sale deed. The defendant contended he is the true owner based on a different sale deed, which the plaintiff argues is a sham.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
F.D.A. 02/2022 in OS.No. 298/2019
Case between Raji.G.S vs N.Gopalkrishna Naidu et al regarding petition for final decree for partition
Raji.G.S filed a petition for a final decree of partition regarding property. The case involves Raji.G.S as the plaintiff and N.Gopalkrishna Naidu and others as defendants.
Final Decree for Partition
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 726/2013
Case between Gopinathan Pillai et al vs Sarojini Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, Gopinathan Pillai and others, are suing the defendants, Sarojini Amma and others, over the right of way to a burial ground. The case involves conflicting claims regarding a pathway leading to the burial site.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 533/2018
Case between Thankamma et al vs Subrahmanian Chettiyar et al regarding partition.
The petitioners, Thankamma, Renuka Devi, and Usha, filed a suit for partition of property against defendants Subrahmanian Chettiyar, Seetha Lekshmi, and Anandammal. A preliminary decree was passed declaring a share over the property, and a final decree was sought to separate the shares.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 298/2019
Case between Raji.G.S vs N.Gopalkrishna Naidu et al regarding partition of property
This case involves Raji.G.S as the plaintiff seeking a final decree for partition of property. The defendants include N.Gopalkrishna Naidu and Biju.G.S, who are contesting the division of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 665/2021
Case between Sujith vs Renjith et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Sujith, seeks a partition of property following the death of their father. The second defendant, Omana, has been missing since 2003, and the plaintiff presumes she is deceased.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 763/2017
Case between Vimalamma vs Sabeena Beevi et al regarding recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.
Vimalamma is the plaintiff claiming ownership and possession of her property, while Sabeena Beevi and others are defendants contesting the claim. The case involves a dispute over boundary encroachment and property possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 1162/2015
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, Jalaja, is seeking to declare her easement right to use a pathway for accessing her property and to restrain the defendants from obstructing it. The defendants, Vijaya Kumar and Sheena, have countered the claim, denying the existence of such a pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 794/2021
Case between K.Rajendran vs V. Vijayakumar regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The case involves a dispute between K.Rajendran and V. Vijayakumar regarding the division of assets from a partnership in a fishing business. The plaintiff alleges misappropriation of profits and seeks a decree for accounts and shares.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS . No.182/2023(FDA)
Case between Anil et al vs Sreemon Srenivasan et al regarding partition of property.
The plaintiffs, Anil, Anjana, and Meenakumari, are involved in a suit for a final decree of partition. The defendants are Sreemon Srenivasan and Sreekuttan, who are also seeking their shares in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 932/2014
Case between Mani.K vs Chandra Babu et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Mani.K, and the defendants, Chandra Babu and Mayadevi, regarding the ownership and encroachment of property. The plaintiff claims to have ownership and seeks a declaration and mandatory injunction against the defendants for encroachments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 415/2015
Case between Vasanthammal et al vs Ushakumari et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
The plaintiffs, Vasanthammal and Vijayammal, are seeking a declaration of their title and possession over a property in Kottamkara Village, which they allege has been encroached upon by the defendants, Ushakumari, Rajalekshmi, and Mahesh. The suit involves fixing the boundaries and preventing further encroachment by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 22/2018
Case between Joy@ Joy Daniel vs Gracykutty George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and easement rights
The plaintiff Joy@ Joy Daniel seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, claiming easement rights over a pathway. The defendants, led by Gracykutty George, filed a counterclaim alleging shared rights to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 416/2022
Case between Kunjumol vs The Kollam Corporation et al regarding permanent injunction.
The plaintiffs, Kunjumol and Aloysius, are husband and wife seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, including the Kollam Corporation and other governmental bodies. They claim to have continuous possession of 3.5 cents of land against illegal encroachment and threats from individuals affiliated with the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 1162/2015
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
Jalaja, the plaintiff, is seeking a declaration of her easement right over a pathway and a permanent injunction against Vijaya Kumar and Sheena, who are the defendants, to prevent them from obstructing her access. The defendants are contending that no such right exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 641/2014
Case between Rajendramany et al vs Secretary, Corporation, Kollam regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rajendramany, Jijesh.S.R., and Jithu.S.R., filed a suit against the Secretary of Kollam Corporation for encroachment and to fix property boundaries. They claimed that the Corporation attempted unauthorized construction impacting their inherited properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 57/2025
Case between M/s.Girija Jayapal vs Dhanapal Sreedharan regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff, M/s. Girija Jayapal, is suing the defendant, Dhanapal Sreedharan, for the possession of an original Will Deed that the defendant has allegedly taken and is refusing to return. The case stems from a dispute over ownership of property inherited by the plaintiff's husband.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No. 110/2020
Case between Nizarudeen vs Oseela Beevi et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction.
The plaintiff, Nizarudeen, claims ownership and possession of property and seeks to fix boundaries against the defendants who are allegedly attempting to unlawfully take possession of the property. The defendants have been accused of causing damage and trespassing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 752/2018
Case between Santhammal vs Shyjumon et al regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession.
The plaintiff, Santhammal, has filed a suit against the defendants, including her son Shyjumon and others, to set aside a settlement deed executed under fraudulent circumstances. She asserts ownership over the property and claims that the defendants have no right to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 16/2020
Case between R.Bahuleyan et al vs Prasad.K et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, R.Bahuleyan and B.Devarajan, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Prasad.K, Bindhu, Perayam Grama Panchayath, and The Deputy Director of Panchayat, to demolish an unauthorized construction affecting their property. The defendants have constructed a thatched shop without permitted authorization.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won