Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 752/2018

Case between Santhammal vs Shyjumon et al regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession.

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
approximately-7 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Santhammal, has filed a suit against the defendants, including her son Shyjumon and others, to set aside a settlement deed executed under fraudulent circumstances. She asserts ownership over the property and claims that the defendants have no right to it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring the settlement deed null and void. The defendants are restrained from entering the property and the plaintiff is entitled to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration that the settlement deed No. 2337/2016 dated 20/09/2016 is null and void; restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring the settlement deed null and void. The defendants are restrained from entering the property and the plaintiff is entitled to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The settlement deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the plaintiff proved her ownership.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1 to A10 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: (i) It is hereby declared that the settlement deed No. 2337/2016 dated 20/09/2016 of Kottiyam SRO is null and void. (ii) The defendants and their men are restrained from entering into the plaint schedule property...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhammal
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyjumon
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vignesh
Party Age
7
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijimol. T
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Settlement deed No. 2337/2016, Land tax receipt dated 29/08/2018, Building tax receipt dated 01/09/2018, Causality Out Patient Tickets, Discharge summary dated 21/08/2018.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil Elgin Thampi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reeja A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kishore R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shamla.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the settlement deed is null and void.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the settlement deed No. 2337/2016 dated 20/09/2016 of Kottiyam SRO is null and void.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Prohibitory injunction against the defendants from entering the property.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are restrained from entering into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property and her residence.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement of the plaintiff to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the fraudulent nature of the settlement done under duress by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Causality Out Patient Ticket
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the plaintiff's medical condition and dependence on the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Causality Out Patient Ticket
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the plaintiff's medical history.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Causality Out Patient Ticket
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates ongoing medical treatment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Discharge Summary
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of hospitalization related to plaintiff's health issues.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to family court proceedings relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Interim Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows prior legal actions taken by the plaintiff against the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Certified Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to ongoing family court decisions affecting the case.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Fraud
Case Code
Case between Santhammal vs Shyjumon et al regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession.
Case Code Year
Case between Santhammal vs Shyjumon et al regarding declaration, permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 08/26/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rajesh vs Sarada et al regarding Final Decree for Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won