Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 1162/2015

Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-9 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Jalaja, is seeking to declare her easement right to use a pathway for accessing her property and to restrain the defendants from obstructing it. The defendants, Vijaya Kumar and Sheena, have countered the claim, denying the existence of such a pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has declared that the plaintiff has a right of easement by prescription over the B schedule pathway and has restrained the defendants from obstructing this pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their agents are restrained from causing any obstruction over the B schedule way or constructing any pillars or gate at the entrance of the C schedule pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has declared that the plaintiff has a right of easement by prescription over the B schedule pathway and has restrained the defendants from obstructing this pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her right of easement by prescription over the B schedule pathway.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The existence of the B schedule pathway has been corroborated by testimonies and reports, demonstrating that the plaintiff and her predecessors have used it continuously for over forty years.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, OS 1159/2015 is dismissed and OS 1162/2015 is decreed with costs as follows: 1) It is declared that the plaintiff has right of easement by prescription over the plaint B schedule way in OS 1162/2015.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jalaja
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijaya Kumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheena
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copies of Sale Deed No. 2634/1985, Sale Deed No. 1817/1975, Land Tax Receipt, Sale Deed No. 4558/07, plaint in OS. 1159/2015, Photographs (3 Nos.)
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 336/2001, Land Tax Receipt, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1356/2013, Land Tax Receipt, Photocopy of Sale Deed No. 4543/03 (Subject to Proof), Photographs (10 Nos.) and CD (1), Photocopy of Survey Plan.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Deepak
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Resmy.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese Jan Yesudas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration of the plaintiff's right of easement by prescription over the B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has right of easement by prescription over the plaint B schedule way in OS 1162/2015.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the B schedule way or constructing on C schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The defendants and their agents are restrained from causing any obstruction over the B schedule way or constructing any pillars or gate at the entrance of the C schedule pathway.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Defendants sought a permanent injunction to restrain plaintiff from interfering with B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs in OS No. 1159/2015 are not entitled to get a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 2634/1985 supporting the ownership of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1817/1975 used to demonstrate the ownership history of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt evidencing payment by the plaintiff indicating possession.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 4558/07 supporting the property transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of plaint in OS. 1159/2015 filed to seek relief against obstruction.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographs evidencing the current state and access of the pathways.
Reference:
Ext.A6 Series
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 336/2001 used to support the defendants' claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt evidencing payment related to the defendants' property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1356/2013 related to the pathway improvement.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Tax Receipt evidencing payment by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photocopy of Sale Deed No. 4543/03 to demonstrate claim.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photographs supporting the defendants' claims.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Photocopy of Survey Plan demonstrating property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and Mahazar prepared indicating the status of pathways.
Reference:
Ext.C1 Series
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and Mahazar prepared for OS No. 1159/2015 detailing the pathways.
Reference:
Ext.C2 Series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Easement rights
Case Code
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 06/27/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Joy@ Joy Daniel vs Gracykutty George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and easement rights
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mani.K vs Chandra Babu et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Gopinathan Pillai et al vs Sarojini Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won