Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Anil, Anjana, and Meenakumari, are involved in a suit for a final decree of partition. The defendants are Sreemon Srenivasan and Sreekuttan, who are also seeking their shares in the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree of partition and monetary compensation for the plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed based on a compromise agreement between the parties regarding the partition of the property. The division of shares was accepted by all parties involved.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs and defendants agreed to a compromise, leading to a legal decree of partition.
The plaintiffs and defendants agreed to a compromise, leading to a legal decree of partition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The parties have no objection with respect to the plan and the plan is accepted.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit is decreed as per the comprise entered between the parties.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anil
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anjana
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Meenakumari
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreemon Srenivasan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekuttan
- Party Age
- 38
Plaintiffs Documents
Commission report, Mahazar, Resurvey plan.
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Panambil S Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Sabu Raj.S.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs and defendants are allotted specific properties as per the final decree.
Evidence:
The final decree is passed as follows: (a) The 1st and 2nd plaintiff are allotted property shown in letters ABGHA in yellow colour having an extent of 0.46 Ares...
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The first and second plaintiffs are to pay owelty for an amount Rs. 7500/- to the third plaintiff and Rs. 3500/- to the first and second defendants.
Evidence:
The first and second plaintiffs are to pay owelty for an amount Rs. 7500/- to the third plaintiff and Rs. 3500/- to the first and second defendants as per the valuation of the property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs and defendants are instructed to deposit a fee for the non-judicial stamp paper.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs and defendants shall deposit Rs. 15/- per Rs.10000/- of the fair value of the plots allotted respectively to them...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Prepared and submitted by Adv. Latheesh.R Prasad detailing the partitioning of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Mahazar
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Prepared and submitted by Adv. Latheesh.R Prasad, showing the measurements and details of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type:
Resurvey Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Prepared and submitted by Suraj.S Surveyor, outlining the division of the property into three plots.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Anil et al vs Sreemon Srenivasan et al regarding partition of property.
Case Code Year
Case between Anil et al vs Sreemon Srenivasan et al regarding partition of property.