Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 794/2021

Case between K.Rajendran vs V. Vijayakumar regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-26
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 days
Case Closed
Thu, 06/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between K.Rajendran and V. Vijayakumar regarding the division of assets from a partnership in a fishing business. The plaintiff alleges misappropriation of profits and seeks a decree for accounts and shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting them half the share of the partnership assets and ordering the defendant to provide an account of profits since April 2020.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to render the accounts of partnership business since 01/04/2020 to the plaintiff; The plaintiff is entitled to get ½ share over the plaint schedule properties; Defendant is permanently restrained from alienating the plaint schedule properties; Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting them half the share of the partnership assets and ordering the defendant to provide an account of profits since April 2020.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff evince that the apprehension of the plaintiff regarding the defeat of plaintiff’s title over the plaint schedule properties is well founded.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. It is directed the defendant to render the accounts of partnership business since 01/04/2020 to the plaintiff. ii. The plaintiff is entitled to get ½ share over the plaint schedule properties. iii. The defendant is permanently restrained from alienating the plaint schedule properties. iv. Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Rajendran
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. Vijayakumar
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Partnership Deed, Office copy of Legal Notice, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Postal Receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Shenaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Albert P.Netto
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant to render the accounts of partnership business since 01/04/2020 to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
It is directed the defendant to render the accounts of partnership business since 01/04/2020 to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to get ½ share over the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get ½ share over the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is permanently restrained from alienating the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The defendant is permanently restrained from alienating the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff and defendant are joint owners of plaint schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the notice issued by the plaintiff to wind up the partnership business.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of receipt related to the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the mailing of the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partnership dispute
Case Code
Case between K.Rajendran vs V. Vijayakumar regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between K.Rajendran vs V. Vijayakumar regarding Partition and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
KOLLAM
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 05/13/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rajesh vs Sarada et al regarding Final Decree for Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won