Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 67 OF 2015

Case between Ayisha vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Ayisha, the plaintiff, seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of her property that she claims was fraudulently assigned to Muhammedkutty, the deceased original defendant, who created a forged document. After discovering this, she filed the suit to cancel the document and regain control of her property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared the document bearing No. 4066/2013 as null and void, affirming that it was not binding on the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of the suit from the defendants
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her case by presenting cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows. I. It is declared that the document bearing No. 4066/2013 of SRO, Tirur (Exbt. A2) is null and void and not binding on the plaintiff, and it is hereby cancelled.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ayisha (72 years) Koralattil House, Thanalur amsom Pakara desom, Thanalur.P.O. Tirur Taluk Ibrahim (48 years) Chakkalakkal House, Thanalur amsom Pakara desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Muhammedkutty (48 years) Melekkattil House, Melepakara Beeran padi, K.P.Moideen Quarters, Thanalur amsom Pakara desom, Thanalur.P.O. Tirur Taluk Ummul Fathima (34 years) Noorul Basheera (16 years) Irfana Beegum (13 years) Abdul Gafoor (50 years) Veliyath (H), Thanalur amsom Pakara desom, Thanalur.P.O. Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declaration that the document bearing No. 4066/2013 of SRO, Tirur is null and void.
Evidence:
It is declared that the document bearing No. 4066/2013 of SRO, Tirur (Exbt. A2) is null and void and not binding on the plaintiff, and it is hereby cancelled.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
But, the plaintiff did not adduce any evidence with regard to her prayer for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the partition deed relevant to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the gift deed which the plaintiff claims is forged and invalid.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases