Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 761/2021

Case between Rugmini Amma vs Mathew.K.Alex regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S., Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rugmini Amma filed a suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against Mathew.K.Alex, claiming ownership over a property based on a previous sale deed. The defendant contended he is the true owner based on a different sale deed, which the plaintiff argues is a sham.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared that Rugmini Amma has right, title and possession over the property and that the sale deed in favor of Mathew.K.Alex is set aside, provided payment of Rs.50,000/- is made with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff shall repay the amount of Rs.50,000/- with 12% interests from 03/08/2012 till repayment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared that Rugmini Amma has right, title and possession over the property and that the sale deed in favor of Mathew.K.Alex is set aside, provided payment of Rs.50,000/- is made with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her possession and ownership through relevant documents and established that the defendant's claims were invalid.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff claims absolute ownership of the plaint schedule property as per Ext.A11 sale deed No.6250/2002 of Kundara SRO and has been in possession, paying land tax and building tax therein.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, it is declared that the plaintiff has right, title and possession over the plaint schedule property and she is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rugmini Amma
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew.K.Alex
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Deed No. 3713/12, Encumbrance Certificate, Possession Certificate, Land Tax Receipt, Release Deed No. 3695/12.
Defendants Documents
Original Sale Deed No. 3713/2012, Letter from Kottamkara Grama Panchayat, Letter from Elampalloor Village Office.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Mohana Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kallada P. Kunjumon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.J.Shibu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Declare the right, title and possession of plaintiff over the plaint schedule property ignoring the document No. 3713/2012 as void.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has right, title and possession over the plaint schedule property and she is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendant from forcefully dispossessing the plaintiff and interfering with her possession.
Evidence:
Defendant is permanently restraining from forcefully dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the possession of the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff to repay the loan amount of Rs.50,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff shall repay the amount of Rs.50,000/- with 12% interests from 03/08/2012 till repayment, which led to the creation of document No.3713/12 of SRO Kundara.
Relief Type: Set Aside
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Set aside the sale deed No. 3713/12.
Evidence:
Sale deed No. 3713/12 of Kundara SRO is set aside on payment of the above stated amount.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to prove the execution and registration of the sale deed referred to by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the legal standing of the property and confirms the plaintiff's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff's ongoing possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates that the plaintiff has been paying taxes for the property, affirming ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that a loan linked to the property was settled in favor of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Sale Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The document claimed by the defendant to establish title over the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter from Kottamkara Grama Panchayat
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Related to the rights regarding the property pending a court decision.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Letter from Elampalloor Village Office
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Conveys information about the property tax and the pending case.
Reference:
Ext.B3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Rugmini Amma vs Mathew.K.Alex regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rugmini Amma vs Mathew.K.Alex regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 12/14/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jameela vs Amanulla et al regarding declaration, mandatory injunction, and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kulathra Sree Mahadevar Devaswam Trust et al vs Raman Pillai et al regarding redemption of mortgage and recovery of permission.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shehina vs Shaji et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sujana. A vs Joyal Jacob Sebastian et al regarding attachment of property before judgment.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won