OS. No. 45/2025

Case between Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple et al vs Pradeep et al regarding Injunction

Court

IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-08-23

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple and its president, filed a suit for injunction. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of plaintiffs and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff absent and no representation.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff absent and no representation.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent and no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Perayam Sri. Bhoothanadha Temple
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Gopalakrishna Pillai

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pradeep
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Raju
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Manu
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aravindhakshan
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Abju
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Dileep.S. Pattathanam
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: G.Krishna Priya
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for Injunction.

Evidence: