Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No.233/2024

Case between Uma Maheswari et al vs Syamala Kumari.K regarding setting aside exparte decree

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months
Case Code No.
233
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners/defendants are seeking to set aside an ex parte decree from June 7, 2022. They argue that they could not appear due to COVID-19 restrictions and only learned of the decree following the death of the original plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to set aside the ex parte decree, enabling the defendants to contest the suit on its merits.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to set aside the ex parte decree, enabling the defendants to contest the suit on its merits.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants were not given a fair opportunity to present their case due to the pandemic and the subsequent lack of knowledge about the decree.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and considering the covid 19 pandemic restrictions and for the disposal of the suit on merit, I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioners/defendants to contest the suit on merit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA.2/24 and RP. 233/24 are allowed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syamala Kumari.K
Party Age
74
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Uma Maheswari
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remya Mohan
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reshmi Mohan
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.Abhilash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sheeja Kannan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Delay condoned and the exparte decree dated 07/6/22 is set aside
Evidence:
Hence IA. 2/24 allowed, delay condoned and the exparte decree dated 07/6/22 is set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 06/07/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Branch Manager, Canara Bank vs Syam Krishnan.G., Gopalakrishnan regarding restoration of suit.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs Anila Anilkumar regarding restoration of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prasanna.P.L vs Shajimon.J regarding setting aside an exparte decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jayachandran Nair @ Jayachandran vs M/s.Canara Bank regarding review of a previous petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rani Chandrika vs Aneesh regarding setting aside an order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won