Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 220/2020

Case between K.N. Mohanan vs M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
approximately-5 years 8 months 18 days
Case Closed
Wed, 06/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, K.N. Mohanan, a licensed contractor, is seeking to recover an amount of ₹10,00,000 from the defendants. The claim arises from a borrowed sum that was supposed to be repaid but remained outstanding after the cheque was dishonoured.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decided in favor of the plaintiff, granting him the recovery of ₹10,00,000 with interest and costs due from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.10,00,000 with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till realisation with costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decided in favor of the plaintiff, granting him the recovery of ₹10,00,000 with interest and costs due from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the existence of a financial transaction by establishing the dishonour of the cheque and failure to repay despite notice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
On going through the oral evidence of the PW1, he categorically stated that the cheque was executed by the defendant. The court found the evidence supportive of the plaintiff's claims and the presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act favored the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till realisation with costs, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.N. Mohanan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.Varadarajan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Cheque, Office copy of Adv. Notice, Reply Notice, Cheque return slip
Defendants Documents
Photostat copy of work order, Photostat copy of order of the Inland Navigation Director

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R.Bahuleyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reghuvarma.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 10,00,000 with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
The money to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/-, which was borrowed by the Defendant from the Plaintiff, was not repaid, despite due demand. Hence, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover the said amount with due interest.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendants to the plaintiff for the borrowed sum of Rs. 10,00,000 and was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an office copy of the advocate notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendants demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the reply notice sent by the defendants in response to the advocate notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque return slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This slip shows the cheque issued by the defendants was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Income Tax Return Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the financial credibility of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Work Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is a photocopy of a work order related to the background of the case.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Order of the Inland Navigation Director
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is a photocopy of an order that supports the defendants' case.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between K.N. Mohanan vs M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between K.N. Mohanan vs M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Simi P vs Shibi P regarding realisation of money
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. A R Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s. BRJ Wood Packers regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Remani C vs Shiji regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aravindakshan et al vs National Investment (Bankers) et al regarding review of exparte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Raveendran Pillai.C vs Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won